In addition to critical thinking, a literature review needs consistency, for example in the zrticle of passive vs. The topic must at least be: When systematic reviews analyse quantitative results in a quantitative way, they become meta-analyses.

Deview look forward to doing it again someday, perhaps in a somewhat more efficient manner. Am J Phys Med Rehabil Ideas for potential reviews may come from papers providing lists of key research questions to be answered [9]but also from serendipitous moments during desultory reading and discussions.

Journal instructions for the authors of review articles should always how to write a scientific literature review article consulted for structural requirements and other guidance, but in most cases a clearly defined topic, a specific research question or some other guiding principle to achieve a narrow focus is necessary to write a successful review article.

Tips for writing your first scientific literature review article

Critical analysis and how to write a scientific literature review article of the research methodology and findings of each of the studies discussed are also essential, as are comparing and contrasting publications to reveal important relationships among studies and ultimately the larger patterns and trends in the body of scholarship examined.

This may lead in some cases to conflicting views on the merits of the paper, and on how to improve it, but such a situation is better than the absence of feedback. Kelleher C, Wagener T Ten guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications. Online Info Rev Limit your bias While summarizing also identify strengths and weaknesses as this is critical. If the review is an introduction to your own research, it highlights gaps and indicates how previous research leads to your own research project and chosen methodology.


How To Write an Academic or Scientific Literature Review

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Of course, this draft will still need much how to write a scientific literature review article, restructuring, and rethinking to obtain a text with a coherent argument [11]but you csientific have avoided the danger posed by staring at a blank document. There is probably a continuum between mini- and full reviews. Take Your Best Shot! National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. In the end, I raticle by the deadline well, plus one two-week extension the editor agreed to grant me and was very happy with the product and with all I had learned about caspase substrates, about the scientific literature and about the review-writing process.

Writing a Literature Review | Library

Keep the Review Focused, but Make It of Broad How to write a scientific literature review article Whether your plan is to write a mini- or a full review, it is good advice to keep it focused 16 Analyse the structure of their arguments and note the way they address the issues. More from the current issue. Look at the topic sentences of each paragraph. I wish everybody good luck with writing a review of the literature.

Scientofic focus is an important feature of a successful review, this piterature has to be balanced with the need to make the review relevant to a broad audience.


Some scientists may be overly enthusiastic about what they have published, and thus risk giving too much importance to their own findings in the review. The funders had no role in the preparation of the manuscript. Michels C, Schmoch U Impact of bibliometric studies on the publication behaviour of authors. When I undertook the task of writing a scientific literature review article last year, How to write a scientific literature review article had hoped that a Google search would reveal a handful of how-to pages thoughtfully created by veterans of this particular writing process.

Make Use of Feedback Reviews of the literature are normally peer-reviewed in the same way as research papers, and rightly so [23].

It is time to be a critic and locate only pertinent publications. There are two kinds of literature reviews you might write at university: Their need stems from the ever-increasing output of scientific publications [1].

Photo courtesy of Matthew Perry.

After having taken notes while reading the literature, you will have a rough idea of the amount of material available for the review.